Question: What is required for a set of uniform codes and regulations to apply to all the persons of the United States?
Answer: Uniformity of legal equality under the law. In other words, equal rights.
It is an ultra-common misconception amongst the subjected people of
the United States in their thought that “rights” are always a good
thing, and that “rights” are always somehow a protection against the
erosion and encroachment of government and corporations (persons) into
the people’s personal liberties. To be even more clear, the general
thought is that rights are always in place to prevent things like crime,
extortion, tyranny, foreclosure, unlawful searches and seizures,
incarceration, and so on from happening to the people.
For instance, one might arrogantly say that they have the right to a
“fair trial”. And yet not once does the consideration dawn upon men of
good conscious that the trial itself is literally forced upon them by
government. Thus, the “right” to a “fair” or “speedy” trial is in
actuality a direct consequence of an oppressive government in the first
place. In other words, the fact that the trial is forced upon a person
is the actual “right”, and the ability to receive the qualities of
“fair” and “speedy” in that trial are not the root of that right. In
this way, we begin to understand that rights are not voluntary at all,
and these governmental rights are indeed forced upon the people. The
government sells this tyranny to the people by baiting us like snake oil
salesman with positive sounding diatribe such as fair and speedy. This
is like me offering you (forcing upon you) my services to get hit with a
hammer upon your head, but the impact will be “quick” and “painless”.
Your right, you see, is to get hit upon the head with a hammer, with the
beneficial service of the impact of that hammer being quick and
painless.
Or you might believe in the “right” to free speech and the ability to
freely assemble. Yet hate speech laws proclaim your speech must be nice
and politically correct. Some cities require you to get a permit for
free speech and to protest or assemble peacefully – but only in small,
roped off , designated areas. The police even tell you that “anything you say may be used against you”
when they read you your “rights”. But how can this be your right? If
you don’t have a choice about these rights, are they really rights?
The real question you must ask is: Can a right be violently forced upon you?
Rest of the article HERE
